Category Archives: Book Reviews

Review: The Millionaire Next Door, by Thomas J. Stanley PhD and William D Danko, PhD

Sept 28,2024. The Millionaire Next Door, by Thomas J. Stanley PhD and William D Danko, PhD, is one of the two books which revealed to me the path to building wealth. The other was of course, Rich Dad Poor Dad by Robert T. Kiyosaki.

The authors spent decades researching the socioeconomic characteristics of the affluent in the United States.  The lessons they pass on, defy popular conceptions of the lifestyle of “the rich”. They show evidence that individuals and families who are asset wealthy, do not behave the way people who are not wealthy, think rich people behave.  They summarize their discovery of this truth, in the Introduction.

“Twenty years ago we began studying how people become wealthy.  Initially, we did it just as you might imagine, by surveying people in so-called upscale neighborhoods across the country.  In time, we discovered something odd.  Many people who live in expensive homes and drive luxury cars do not actually have much wealth.  Then, we discovered something even odder:  many people who have a great deal of wealth do not even live in upscale neighborhoods. “

Continuing…

“What have we discovered in all of our research?  Mainly, that building wealth takes discipline, Sacrifice, and hard work.  Do you really want to become financially independent? Are you and your family willing to reorient your lifestyle to achieve this goal?  Many will likely conclude they are not.  If you are willing to make the necessary trade-offs of your time, energy, and consumption habits, however, you can begin building wealth and Achieving financial independence. ” The Millionaire Next Door will start you on this journey.

Following are some of my notes, to give you a taste of the wisdom contained in the book.  The book was published initially in 1996, and it is based on research done in the immediately preceding years.  $1 million in 1996 is worth approximately $2 million today $1,000,000 in 1996 → 2024 | Inflation Calculator (in2013dollars.com).  I will use the term “millionaire” as used in the book, to denote a person who is wealthy in assets, even though $1million is not what it used to be. 

Some themes emerge in the book…

Stanley and Danko found that eighty percent of America’s millionaires are first -generation rich.  They follow a lifestyle conducive to accumulating money, and possess 7 characteristics in common:

1. They live below their means

2. they allocate their time, energy and money efficiently, in ways conducive to building wealth.

3. they believe that financial independence is more important than displaying high social status.

4. their parents did not provide economic outpatient care (financial gifts from relatives, which grant free access to a purchase of interest). More on this later...

5. their adult children are economically self sufficient

6. they are proficient in targeting market opportunities

7. they chose the right occupation

The hope of the authors, is that the reader can learn to develop these characteristics in himself.  They illustrate their findings with numerous case studies and anecdotes.

Saving money with which to invest and build assets, is an important route to wealth.  Earning a high income by itself will not lead to lasting wealth.

The wealth of Millionaires is not necessarily proportional to their income.  According to the authors’ research data: “More than 70% of their neighbors earn as much or more than they earn.  But fewer than 50 % of their neighbors have a net worth of $1m or more.  Most of these millionaires’ high-income, low-net worth neighbors make the wrong assumption.  They assume that by focusing their energy on generating high incomes, they will automatically become affluent.  They play excellent offense in this regard.  Most are positioned in the top 3 or 4% or higher of the income distribution for all US households.  Most look the part of millionaires. Yet they are not wealthy.  They play lousy defense.  We have stated many times the belief of countless millionaires who have told us

“It is much easier in America to earn a lot than it is to accumulate wealth. Why is this the case?  Because we are a consumption oriented society.  The high income producing non millionaires are among the most consumption oriented people in America.

Those wealthy people who do not have an extraordinarily high income, become wealthy by living within their means.  This ability is not simply a matter of accounting.  They successfully inoculated themselves from contracting the high-consumption lifestyle that many of their neighbors adopted (see Rich Dad, Poor Dad).   Of note, it is not essential to be an entrepreneur in order to be a millionaire.  This is important, as not everyone is prepared to bear the time commitments required by entrepreneurship, that is extremely taxing on personal and family life.  The authors suggest that an income of twice the median income (the median income in the U.S. was about $75,000 in 2022) can be stewarded to achieve millionaire status.

On of the most powerful themes of the book, relates to the concept of “Economic Outpatient Care”:

Stanley and Danko use the term “Economic Outpatient Care” to denote gifts of money to family members. The gifted money may be targeted to pay for things which promote the capability of the recipient to fulfil their potential, and build assets.  On the other hand, Economic Outpointed Care may enable the recipient to avoid making the transition from consumer to investor, which I outlined in my review for Kiyosabi’s “Rich Dad Poor Dad”.  Recurrent gifts of this type, earmarked to finance a lifestyle as a family entitlement, in effect starve the recipient of the experience of personal growth, including hardship, required to become a millionaire.

The authors recount:

“America’s millionaires are more than 5 times more likely than the average household to have a son or daughter graduate from medical school, 4 times more likely to have a child who is a law school graduate. Paying for an education is the equivalent to teaching your children how to fish.  …..Some gifts have a strong positive influence on the productivity of the recipient. These include subsidizing your children’s education and, more important, earmarking gifts so they can start or enhance a business.  Many self-made millionaires/entrepreneurs know this intuitively.  “

“Conversely, what is the effect of cash gifts that are knowingly earmarked for consumption and the propping up of a certain lifestyle?  We find that the giving of such gifts is the single most significant factor that explains lack of productivity among the adult children of the affluent.  All too often such “temporary” gifts affect the recipient’s psyche.  Cash gifts earmarked for consumption dampen one’s initiative and productivity.  They become habit forming.  These gifts then must be extended throughout most of the recipient’s life. “

“Why do gift receivers have a lower propensity to accumulate wealth than do nonreceivers:

Giving precipitates more consumption than saving and investing. …

Remember, expensive homes are typically located in what we call high consumption neighborhoods.  Living in such neighborhoods requires more than just being able to pay the mortgage.  To fit in, One needs to “look the part” in terms of one’s clothing, landscaping, home maintenance, automobiles, furnishings, and so on.  And don’t forget to add high property taxes to all the other items.  Thus,  gift of a down payment, whether full or partial, can place a recipient on a treadmill of consumption and continued dependence on the gift giver.  …..

Many gift receivers in such situations become sensitive to the need for continued Economic Out Patient care.  Their orientation may even dramatically change from a focus on self-generated economic achievement to one of hoping for and contemplating the arrival of additional gifts.  Underachieving income producers in such cases find it nearly impossible to accumulate wealth.”

“What can you give your children to enhance the probability that they will become economically productive adults? In addition to an education, create an environment that honors independent thoughts and deeds, cherishes individual achievements, and rewards responsibility and leadership. Yes, the best things in life are often free. Teach your own to live on their own. It’s much less costly financially, and, in the long run, it is in the best interests of both the children and their parents. “

“There are countless examples of the inverse relationship between economic productivity and the presence of substantial economic gifts. Our own data, collected over the past twenty years, repeatedly support this conclusion. Independent of college tuition, more than two thirds of American millionaires received no economic gifts from their parents. And this includes most of those whose parents were affluent.”

“Weakening the Weak:

Here’s some food for thought: Most affluent people have at least two children.  Typically, the most economically productive one receives the smaller share of his or her parent’s wealth, while the least productive receives the lion’s share of both economic outpatient care and inheritance.” 

Perpetuating dependence by chronically doling out Economic Outpatient Care, keeps the dependent relatives weak and leads to chronic anxiety about their economic future.

Chronic recipients of Economic Outpatient Care have more fear about their economic future than do persons who independently built their own capability to build wealth.

“Typical affluent business owner shave only three major concerns (see table 3-4 in Chapter 3)

All of these are related to the federal government.  They fear policies and regulations that are unfavorable to business owners and the affluent population in general.  “

“This is because these affluent business owners have overcome most of their fears.  They have inoculate themselves from many fears by becoming completely self-sufficient.  And it was the very struggle to become economically self -sufficient that helped these business owners overcome them. “

The self-made wealthy persons possess courage to take reasonable financial risk.

“Webster’s defines courage as “mental or moral strength to resist opposition, danger, or hardship.”  It implies firmness of mind and will in the face of danger or extreme difficulty.  Courage can be developed.  But it cannot be nurtured in an environment that eliminates all risks, all difficulty, all dangers,” which is characteristically the environment in which chronic recipients of Economic Outpatient Care are raised.

“Affirmative Action, Family style

P 269. You can’t hide from adversity.  You can’t hide your children from life’s ups and downs.  The ones who achieve do so by experiencing and conquering obstacles.  Even from their childhood days.  These are the ones who were never denied their right to face some struggle, some adversity.  Others were, in reality, cheated.  Those who attempted to shelter their children from every conceivable germ in our society, never really inoculated them from fear, worry, and the feeling of dependency.  Not at all. “

“Jobs: Millionaires Versus Heirs

“P 290. What types of businesses do millionaires own? Our answer was the same one we give everyone:  You can’t predict if someone is a millionaire by the type of business he is in.  After twenty years of studying millionaires across a wide spectrum of industries, we have concluded that the character of the business owner is more important in predicting his level of wealth than the classification of his business. “

In conclusion, Stanley and Danko’s research show that lasting asset wealth is achieved by persons who build courage and ability to invest in a business or other wealth building assets. Their voyage must begin in the absence of external aid which might enable them to escape the need to build their own abilities. The decision to habitually direct funds to investment goals rather than financing a stereotypical rich lifestyle, is the determining key to building wealth.

The detailed data and case studies enable the reader to find a way of being “the millionaire next door” in their own particular way.  This book, along with Kiyosabi’s Rich Dad, Poor Dad, was seminal in revealing to me the path to relative wealth and freedom.

I hope that if more people can learn about how wealth is created, more people will realize that the path to feeling one has “enough”, satisfaction with one’s wealth, is not envy, or attempting to appropriate the wealth that other people created, as encouraged by the US Democratic Party. Rather, you can create your own wealth. And to do this, you must build or invest in something that people actually want to buy. That is, you must create value.  And value is good.

The Personal Growth evolution of Consumer to Investor: review of R. Kiyosaki: “Rich Dad Poor Dad”.

12-15-2023. From an only financial point of view, wealth might be defined as financial freedom which confers the liberty to choose how to allocate one’s time and resources, according to one’s personal values, and not from necessity. The path to this liberty is formed by many years of living in a way that builds that wealth.  That is to say, time spent building assets.  This is logical because wealth cannot be built by prioritizing expenses which result in transient pleasures (for example, expensive restaurant meals). Rather, wealth is built by accumulating assets which produce income greater than the value invested, that is, they have a good return on investment.

But there is a further underlying truth of a fundamental nature.   Your personal values and habits determine whether you live as an investor, or as a consumer, with the corresponding habits and rewards.  Do you expect to spend on things which are satisfying but have minimal future value (return on investment)? Or do you conserve your financial resources, directing them in a focused manner towards projects which will give a good return on investment? If you are accustomed to living as a consumer, you will find it difficult to engage in successfully investing activity on specific isolated occasions.  

Becoming someone who saves money to fund your investments, be they business, real estate or common stocks, requires a rearrangement of your spending priorities, from consumption to investment.  And this changes your life in many ways, affecting your use of spare moments, choice of reading material, what you eat, choice of car, friends you choose, leisure time, clothes, etc. 

Therefore, the path of learning to invest so as to gain financial freedom, is very much the path of Personal Growth, the path of investment in yourself.  The hard thing about personal growth, is that it requires change. And the prospect of change brings fear, in that it implies abandoning the familiar emotional landscape.

I feel that this is at the root of the difficulty that Robert Kiyosaki describes in his seminal book “Rich Dad Poor Dad”. This book was probably the very first I read, in my personal transformation from consumer to investor. I believe in 2001. It sparked a life changing transformation over a number of years.

Kiyosaki initially paints a picture of the conventional Rat Race.  According to conventions of socioeconomic status, a successful person lands a “good job” providing significant earned income. They spend this earned income to fund a desirable lifestyle, financing it with debt via  in mortgages, credit cards.  Frequently, both spouses in a marriage work. As careers prosper and incomes rise, so do taxes. Moreover, The couple must spend to enjoy themselves, on vacation, luxuries, the fruits which allow them to feel justified in spending their hours in labor.  When children arrive, the dream house must be purchased. Home equity loans are obtained, meant to reduce high interest debt, which nevertheless seems to reproduce itself.  As the children begin their education in the best school available, the spending increases dramatically.  The conventionally successful citizens pursue the elusive goals of the ideal socioeconomically advantaged individuals.  However, they never attain true financial freedom because of the poor margin of their income, primarily from labor earnings, over their expenses. They never built income earning assets. From a business point of view, the function of their Rat Race lifestyle run is to provide revenue for interest earning financial institutions which are financing their lifestyle. 

In the Rat Race, all forces militate against the growth of assets, wealth and the attendant liberty.  The alternative to the Rat Race, is to grow assets. The income these produce, with much less of your time commitment, will give you the liberty to choose how to spend your time, studying or working on something you value.  You thus gain control over your life.

Anyone can achieve the prosperity conferred by owndership of assets, if they acquire financial education. That is, the understanding of assets and liabilities. 

But what prevents individuals from embarking on their own personal growth of financial education?  Emotions that are not fully recognized, such as fear and greed.  Out of Fear it is that  you take the suitable job which promises a solid pension, and not because you have a love and talent to fulfil your greatest potential as a bureaucrat.  Out of fear you spend to impress your spouse or friends, or buy that house, which really means, acquiring the mortgage which ties you to that job, and address.

The path to personal growth might go something like this.  First, recognize the emotion. Then, realize you do not need to act on it. Third, while you contemplate that emotion, see if you can understand what is actually, and with some reason, causing it.  For example, fear of not having enough money in your old age. Fourth, think about a way that meets that reasonable need, more effectively.  Regarding financial education, that would be, identifying an investment you could make that will provide a better return on investment.  And this final step, is a long and fascinating adventure of education that will entail multiple episodes of uncertainty, but if you have the courage to continue the quest, will also entail times of euphoric discovery, followed by incredulity that few others have discovered these paths to wealth.

Truly, the personal growth of financial education is open to anyone. To begin, you need openness to the possibility of growth, and courage to leave your familiar fears.  And both of those cost no money.

Young people who do not follow the crowd can reach their full potential

For a vivid account of early Microsoft history and the tale of how a couple of intelligent, determined youngsters, who thought out of the box and had the courage to act on their convictions, created what would become one of the most formidable companies in history, read the splendid Hard Drive: Bill Gates and the Making of the Microsoft Empire
by James Wallace and Jim Erickson.

Why Book Reviews?

July 27, 2014.

I am reluctant to spend time learning how to invest successfully, solely for my own benefit.

I have benefitted from my attempts to teach others, in that teaching successfully requires that one articulate ideas lucidly, whether in spoken conversation, or in writing. And I do aspire to write truthfully.  So, teaching others helps me in that journey. 

There is also the ethical aspect. Just as I helped myself and my family by investing, I may perhaps touch others, who might discover the opportunities and gratification of the investing approach to life. Others may benefit so immensely from understanding that investment is fundamentally, the allocation of your resources, to preserve and grow your capabilities, maximize your potential. And your truly maximal potential will be as directed by your talents and intentions, no others.

I have learned by reading accomplished investors. Their writings are a crucial starting place and continuing education, and it is natural and important that I point my readers to this material. I have read every book I review. My reviews are my personal take on the book, not taken from elsewhere.

book review for required reading

This is a brief review of The Intelligent Investor, Rev. EdProfessor Graham was a highly intelligent, educated and erudite gentleman who writes lucidly with a gentle humour. Warren Buffet thinks this is “the best book about investing ever written”.

It is mandatory reading for amateurinvestors because it explores three key insights. One is that market prices for potential investments are not predictable, at times tending to sink below the worth of the investment as a going concern (or even the company assets in liquidation), at other times greatly overstating the value of the company. Second, to achieve an adequate return on investment, one must buy at a price that is relatively low, in the sense that it is not a product of the market’s over optimistic view of the company’s prospects. And while particularly true for poor quality companies, this is even true for good quality, promising companies. Third, the investor must beware of his own emotions as a source of erroneous transactions; both in purchasing out of misplaced eagerness, or selling out of misplaced regret or fear.

Finding the listing for the hardcopy, 4th revised edition of this book on Amazon, I was surprised to encounter the notice that “You bought this book on May 1st, 2002”. I remembered that time of my first foray into the world of investing as one marked by trepidation. It was a difficult time for my family in NYC in the economic contraction following 911.

As a very late starter in investing, my first participation in the excitement offered by the market was guided by the breathless optimism of the internet/biotech/large cap growth bubbles that formed the landscape of the euphoric peak of the bull market at the climax of the 1990s.

Until the spring of 2000, there was still a magical energy which propelled seemingly all stocks worth talking about upward. In March this vaporized amongst earnings disappointments and surprise indebtedness on the part of the market darlings. The media conversation began turning to more prosaic matters such as, the requirement for actual earnings. But matters did not rest there, by any means. The market plunged at unpredictable intervals, repeatedly bludgeoning the remaining hope in the power of the market to heal all financial ills. Subsequent years were marked by the record breaking, wholescale corporate fraud and subsequent bankruptcies of Enron, then Worldcom among others, capped by the attacks of 911 and accompanying recession.

The online media pundits which had been so glibly confident were plainly wrong. But I had no alternative basis for a sound policy to guide investment, that is, until I found this book.

Warren Buffet, who did not invest in tech stocks, had been derided as an out of date bumpkin by the investing media during the halcyon days of the tech market bubble. The stock price of Berkshire Hathaway bottomed as the NASDAQ peaked, and surged as the tech stocks plunged, dashing media expectations. Now these same pundits held him up as a clairvoyant. I researched the name of the investor who was now held up as an oracle, began with reading his letters to shareholders, made my way to his mentor, Benjamin Graham.

A subsequent edition, contains commentary on each chapter by Jason Zweig Reading the original text gives an authentic sense of Mr. Graham’s pearls of wisdom. The commentary, while useful at times, also injects some scarcely relevant, unnecessary additional points which can detract from the uniqueness of Mr. Graham’s message. Once you have read the original, it might be useful to reread, this time adding the commentary. I mean no disrespect to Mr. Zweig. I own both editions and periodically reread parts of them. But Martin Zweig is not Benjamin Graham.

The content in the 1986 edition (which also forms the basis for the later 2005 edition with Zweig commentary) dates from 1971. A superficial reading results in the impression that the book is dull, because out of date. Rest assured, dear amateurinvestor, in this book you will find among many other nuggets: that there is nothing truly new under the sun in the recent history of wall street speculation and investor foibles; and that the fruitful search for worthwhile investments will take you in a quite different direction from wall street/media stock market forecasters, analysts and other pundits. These revelations are made even more clearly in Mr. Graham’s other masterpiece, Security Analysis: Sixth Edition, Foreword by Warren Buffett (Security Analysis Prior Editions) which I read following Intelligent Investor.

Some of the important points Mr. Graham makes:

The definition of investment: “an investment operation is one which, upon thorough analysis promises safety of principal and an adequate return. Operations not meeting these requirements are speculative.” This is a definition which I have adopted for my own “investment operations”.

Reviewing the implications to the investor of Market Fluctuations, he reiterates that “the future of security prices is never predictable”. That is, one can never predict precisely when or in what direction they will fluctuate. He illustrates this with innumerable examples of fluctuations in both bond and stock markets which were unexpected to the professional financial traders. “The investor can scarcely take seriously the innumerable predictions which appear almost daily and are his for the asking”.

He elaborates on the distinction of market price of a stock and its value, describing innumerable examples of “discrepancies between price and value” that he found for a specific companies. He addresses the effect of prices on the hopes and fears of the individual investor. He also notes that the attitudes of the population of investors drive market prices separately from the value of the underlying companies. Investors (including financial professionals) make decisions or rather follow each other as a crowd. The market therefore consistently exaggerates both over and undervaluation. Which brings me to one my favorite Benjamin Graham quotations:

“To enjoy a reasonable chance for continued better than average results, the investor must follow policies which are inherently sound and promising, and not popular on wall street”.

Mr. Graham emphasizes the work needed to achieve outstanding results. Reasonably reliable results can be obtained by choosing investments conservatively and making sure to purchase at a relatively low price relative to historical prices for comparable investments (defensive investor). To attempt to beat the market consistently by choosing companies liable to grow at a more rapid rate or investigating the finances of companies to make purchases at more notable discounts from asset value (enterprising investor), requires considerable learning and effort.

“…The art of investment has one characteristic that is not generally appreciated. A creditable, if unspectacular, result can be achieved by the lay investor with a minimum of effort and capability; but to improve this easily attainable standard requires much application and more than a trace of wisdom. If you merely try to bring just a little extra knowledge and cleverness to bear upon your investment program, instead of realizing a little better than normal results, you may well find that you have done worse.”

The rate of return to be expected does not dependent on the degree of risk the investor is willing to take on. Rather, it depends on the amount of intelligent effort he is able to bring to bear on his task. Moreover the enterprising investor’s efforts must be based on facts and reason.

“You are neither right nor wrong because the crowd disagrees with you. You are right because your data and reasoning are right”.

I note that he hinted at the role of an emotional commitment, for this assertion was preceded by the following:

“Have the courage of your knowledge and experience. If you have formed a conclusion from the facts and if you know your judgment is sound, act on it, even though others may hesitate or differ”

The most efficient and simple formula investing method for the lay investor is cost averaging into a broad market index, carrying on regardless of market fluctuations. This approach is mathematically guaranteed to beat the market over time. In fact, this would also beat the vast majority of career investors in the financial industry. “Even the majority of the investment funds, with all their experienced personnel, have not performed so well over the years as has the general market” Why is this? Mr. Graham addresses the root cause. He recognizes the influence of emotions on buy/sell decisions. The greatest danger to the investor lies in taking emotional cues from the marketplace, confidently buying when the price is climbing, and anxiously selling as the price falls.

For the cost averaging investor, the only barrier remaining between the investor and his/her modestly market beating returns is the challenge of carrying on while ignoring market fluctuations. Mr. Graham recommends not starting a cost averaging program if the market is high relative to recent history, because if/when it falls, the investor is liable to fearfully stop the program. This shows that Mr. Graham did not consider that the average (defensive) investor attained the emotional discipline to ignore market fluctuations.

Margin of safety

As investors’ mood changes, the market will offer a price which does allow some margin of safety, or at least is more reasonable in relation to the past p/e ratio for the specific company.

Growth stocks are those representing companies whom are recognized as promising better than average income growth, and the stock price spends much time in an overvalued relative to the company assets. Its price is predicated on the expectation of a rate continued earnings growth. This growth is predicted by the same analysts who, as mentioned above, are unable to make long or short term market predictions accurately.

To avoid prolonged or permanent loss of capital, one must buy with a margin of safety, at a price which is relatively low. With growth stocks, this means one should wait until their price has experienced one of the dips which invariably occur and recur, although seemingly not when expected. Which brings me to the second of my favorite Graham quotations, and one the wisdom of which I have repeatedly had to relearn:

“while enthusiasm may be necessary for great accomplishments elsewhere, on Wall Street it almost invariably leads to disaster.”

And yet perhaps disaster is too vivid a characterization of the suboptimal price obtained for an investment, when patience would have allowed the appearance of a much better one. The limitations of Professor Grahams’ approach, lie in the fundamentally fearful or defensive approach to market fluctuations. His approach to avoiding losses hinges on making purchases at relatively low prices, so as to avoid having to endure the fear created by market downturns.

In my view, he did not go beyond this defensive posture, to attempt to identify companies which would provide above average investment returns over time, in spite of market fluctuations. This apprehensiveness extended to the cost average, whom he advised not to begin a cost averaging program when the market seems high, although mathematically speaking, continuing the program through “thick and thin” is the source of success in this formula investing.

He noted that some investments that he had sold, or that others held, continued to produce superior returns, and did appear overvalued by the market, nevertheless continuing to grow in value. He attributed the ability to hold investments through vigorous market fluctuations to emotional investment by the holder, but did not make a concerted attempt to understand how investments with these long term superior results are produced.

The amateurinvestor blog results from an attempt to address both of these issues. By learning to ignore market fluctuations, we can buy in the face of market fear and derision, or hold fast in the same. By insisting on only companies with a clearly sustainable competitive advantage, we can outperform the market. As Prof. Graham intimated, an emotional component of ownership is important. In my view, familiarity, resulting from fact based research on the company, gives the investor the fortitude to buy in the face of market fear, and continue to hold in the face market fluctuations based on an understanding of the company’s destiny as a going concern.

It is important to note the Prof. Graham’s cautious approach is likely attributable to his personal history. His family emigrated from England to the United States in 1895 and settled in New York City when he was one year old. His father Isaac was a workaholic who owned and operated a thriving business importing, distributing and selling European gifts and artifacts to the United States. While young Benjamin’s family lived in luxury initially, his father died of pancreatic cancer when he was 9 years old, and the family quickly and unexpectedly descended into poverty. Driven by need, Benjamin became as assiduous worker. He was extremely gifted in intelligence, and was offered full professorship in separate disciplines upon graduating from Columbia University at age 20, but instead went to work on Wall Street and became a partner through merit of his skills in an investment firm. The Crash of 1929 almost wiped out the firm, and this lesson is another source of Prof. Graham’s defensive approach to investing. The biography of Benjamin Graham is readable in the enjoyable book: The Einstein of Money: The Life and Timeless Financial Wisdom of Benjamin Graham

In my view, this story shows again, that personal emotions cannot be separated from investment. Investment means placing part of yourself into a vehicle from which you hope to gain. The fate of the investment will be shaped by economic and financial realities. But it will also be shaped by the human nature of the investor, with his or her hopes or fears determining the price of the final sale, as well as the unpredictably changing attitudes of the market of investors at large.

Professor Graham’s defensive approach may have been shaped by the fears of his childhood and early professional career. It was very successful, and he found greater fulfilment in intellectual pursuits including such as classical literature, writing, and social and romantic interests. Perhaps he did not have the emotional need or hunger to identify investments which would create riches vaster than any other’s. In this he contrasts with Warren Buffet, who has seemingly dedicated his life, from early childhood, to creating the strongest “financial fortress” on the planet, and who has recognized the power of the sustainable competitive advantage. Mr. Buffet’s efforts are have an important emotional component too, whether admitted or not.